Mobius

i do love the arr stack, i don't use them to download anything but i use them to rename my linux ISOs

I also want to mention that the HexOS team is still very small and iirc still under 10 people, majority of whom were hired after the beta launch. I believe the current priorities are to make HexOS easier to use not optimize it for honestly fringe use cases. By using truenas underneath HexOS we are able to improve HexOS many fold faster than if we branched away from truenas and can no longer use their updates. i see you don't want zfs but a big selling point for nas software is zfs. If HexOS didnt have zfs myself and no doubt many other "power users" would not have purchased a license. So there are trade offs and we cannot just say more ppl would buy hexos if it didn't have zfs. Just because we have stronger hardware doesn't mean we don't want the ease of use that comes from HexOS. Many users have actually bought new/used parts to make a hexos build and many users here have helped them make budget builds. i would be thrilled if HexOS also supported lower spec devices but honestly i don't see the point. Apps won't be able to run on these devices and the experience wouldn't be great in general souring what users think of HexOS. Its like the people i know that say android phones are bad because the $200 android phone they bought is slower than the $1000 iphone they replaced it with. Lastly JonP did respond to your previous thread saying they aren't in a position to work on lowering minimum spec requirements currently and will consider it after the 1.0 release.

it was an interesting build but the parts list did not make too much sense (custom case aside).

maybe some of the space limitations can be overcome with a custom 3d printed case?

Jonp has mentioned somewhere that we shouldn't need to make a clean install for when HexOS leaves beta

Since the turnkey nas you mentioned charge a premium because of their fairly polished proprietary OS. I would also assume it would cost somewhere in between the 2

Custom built nas. intel core ultra 265k + asus prime matx motherboard (i would not recommend this motherboard)

it makes more sense to go with an intel cpu with integrated graphics intel has quick sync which great for transcoding videos. a dedicated gpu is unnecessary for plex in most cases

seems like what you want isn't very intense. there is this prebuilt that has been kinda popular This build is something that could work for you too https://nl.pcpartpicker.com/list/Jd292x I would however consider checking ebay to see if you can find a 8500(t) or 9500(t) and a compatible motherboard for cheap I'm not sure what the price for the jonsbo n4 is in europe so i just put in a conservative estimate for price. The Sagittarius 8 bay chassis that @Sonic mentioned is also an option.

the closest thing to that we have is profile -> edit profile -> fill out the about me section

Now when you say the deck portion do you mean the password to login to deck or the password to claim a server in deck?

you can get away with used if you are on a budget or just want to spend your money wisely. you can also buy newer hardware if you have more intensive workloads or want to "futureproof" is immich the only thing you plan on using? Personally i would recommend at least 1 small nvme drive for the OS (like 128gb) but some users have 2 ssds as their boot drive for additional safety. As for storage you just need 2+ of the same kind of drive. If you know all you need is a few tb, getting multiple ssds can make sense however for the same price you can likely get 5x more hdd storage if storage density is your priority. If you lmk your budget excluding storage i can recommend you what i think is your best fit.

They are both great systems. the big difference between the 2 systems are that the second one has 6 sata ports meaning you can plug in 6 hdds and the first had 4. The amount of drives in total that you want might be your deciding factor. However with a HBA card you can always add more drives. You have a pretty large cooler that won't fit many nas cases. Atx sized power supplies also have the same problem. An expensive but totally worth it case would probably be the jonsbo n5 which can fit either system. In general for more budget conscious builds i would recommend the jonsbo n4 but between a new psu and cooler, most of the savings would disappear. The 12600k likely will use less power than your 12700k which is pretty important for a nas. One more thing of note, you only need a very small boot drive for hexos, all extra space in the boot drive is unusable. It might be considering getting a small one just for that purpose.

You can manually set the drives to spin down but in general its not recommended since drives die faster that way. spinning up and down causing additional wear is not exclusive to zfs. An all ssd system would likely use much less idle power but that expensive for other reasons.

i forget the exact toggle but when building the pool in truenas you can set it to include drives of larger sizes.

Hexos actually hasn't given me any issues with my mismatched drives I have a pool of 2 16s and 3 14s

If you have some USB (flash drives) lying around you can plug them in and make a temp pool with them to get past the pool requirements Then you can go into truenas and import your existing pool. It should should up in hexos I think there was one user that said he went into truenas and imported first then hit the create pool button in hexos setup but hexos did not delete his pool and name a new one. That said do it at your own risk

so as of right now HexOs shouldn't pick up any existing pools however there are some workarounds that work to varying levels of success

Make sure you purchase CMR drives and not SMR drives. Personally I recommend fewer larger drives than more smaller drives. These drives have non-insignificant idle power costs so you will be saving a decent amount of money every year going with the larger drives. Also you do have a limit of how many hard drive bays you have so using larger hard drives makes the most of each bay if you ever wanted to expand. I would go with three of the largest hard drives that financially and practically make sense for you. This is because you need a minimum of three drives in a pool already if you ever want to expand a pool in HexOS

The notification is 100% in the truenas side, im not sure if deck got updated to filter out that notification. If you are wondering where to get official hexos communications it'll be in the announcements section. Sometimes however JonP posts info in relevant threads, in which case community members like myself spread the words to those who haven't seen it.

I believe some users reported using raid z2 without any issues. If you want speed you may wanna 2 or 3 raid z1 vdevs combined into 1 pool. As far as i know raid z1 gives you the performance of a single drive however for every vdev you have the performance increases ergo 3 mirror vdevs will have the performance of 3 drives 2 z1 vdevs of 3 drives each will have the performance of 2 drives.

It'll be nice if the team is able to do that, i just imagine it's not a high priority until majority of the hexos specific features are implemented. The hexos team is smaller than i had expected too. It was a team of 2 that grew to 5 around the time of beta launch with more ppl slowly being onboarded

it used to not be so annoying but the one drive sync feature got depreciated a year-ish ago google drive shouldn't be so bad

ah i didnt realize onedrive sync became such a pain. here is a link to a couple work arounds https://www.truenas.com/community/threads/truenas-scale-23-10-0-1-cloudsync-with-microsoft-onedrive.114315/

i would just setup sync then turn sync off after the files have finished transferring the first time