Jump to content
  • 13

CloudFlare tunnels as a core feature


Question

Posted

NginxProxyManager and Tailscale are great but I'd personally love to see a built in setting for Cloudflare Tunnels.  I recently did a setup for UpTimeKuma, which has it built in and it was gloriously easy.  I can see how it might overlap with your paid business model but just throwing my coins in the wishing well.

  • Like 13

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 1
Posted

I second this. NPM is a nightmare setup for me and have never been able to get it setup reliably. Cloudflare Tunnels just works. Integration with HexOS would make an already promising software solution even better.

  • 0
Posted

Just adding my +1 for Cloudflare integration. I also think tunnels/Zero Trust align with the HexOS goal of having lots of capability without all of the complexity and setup. Much easier to get working (and more reliable) than a reverse proxy in my experience. 

  • Like 1
  • 0
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Wild said:

I'd love native cloudflare tunnels support, my ideal setup would be able to easily map subdomains that I own to apps hosted on HexOS

I use cloudflare tunnels for everything and have built out plenty of tooling to do this exact thing.  Playing devil's advocate and not knowing anything about the developers roadmap or mindset, adding subdomain configuration would require interacting with the Cloudflare API.  This also adds a third party dependency (Cloudflare API) to have to worry about changing or being updated breaking that feature.

Edited by jmztaylor
  • Like 1
  • 0
Posted

I like the idea, but an important thing to consider is that cloudflare tunnels are not made for transfering big files or streaming high bitrate videos. All traffic goes through cloudflare and costs them money.

A solution like tailscale on the other hand facilitates peer to peer connections and all traffic after the initial connection building flows peer to peer. Here big files or streams are not a problem.

Hence cloudflare tunnels are great for applications that are light on transfers but especially for more NAS media stuff it is just not suited.

Hopes this gives some perspective 🙂

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...