vogam7

Another month, huh? The least you could do is respect the people waiting with some communication ahead of time. Instead it's silence all day on release day and a last-minute delay notice as if it wasn't clear days ago this could happen. You created this self-imposed deadline,, nobody forced it. A delay with advance communication - fine. But the silence until 9 PM? That's just pure disrespect

I'll just say what many are thinking here.. you're launching a hexos local beta just 9 days before the promised stable release date. How could this be included in 1.0 and called stable in under a week of testing? Refunds seem to be the go-to response for anyone who expresses frustration in other threads.. but that's beside the point for those of us who actually want this project to succeed. Missed deadlines are frustrating enough, but the communication issues that still keep coming up alongside them make it worse.. and for a project that depends on people investing in hardware, that trust matters. Server memory and now drives have nearly doubled since the originally promised end of 2025 release date. Every delay has a cost beyond just frustration. A straight timeline update would go a long way. I don't think you meant it this way, but the timing of this post is pretty telling... are we in for another delay?

With only a few weeks left before the stable release, could someone confirm or deny whether single-drive pools still break the HexOS interface? Has this been fixed already? I couldn’t find any recent updates on the forum when searching “single drive pools” since a few posts from Jan / May

'Coming in Q2’ probably means no news until late June. Jokes aside, my biggest gripe is that Hex OS, which was supposed to save us time by eliminating the need to deal with config headaches and dig through TrueNAS manuals, actually <at least for now> introduces more moving parts and points of failure in the TrueNAS and Hex symbiosis. I get that many issues appear to be caused by people updating to unauthorized versions of TrueNAS, but there are also a number caused by unintended Plex or Immich app updates and/or unusual app configurations, forcing the need to find advanced workarounds that the product’s intended novice NAS users likely wouldn’t have to deal with on latest vanilla TrueNAS OS. I appreciate the challenge the dev team is tackling, but maybe this should’ve stayed in closed beta a bit longer