All Activity

vaya ,,a mi me llego tarde el problemA....... resulta que actualice ayer y ya no encuentro el puerto de enlace por ninguna parte para ver si sigue funcionando hace un mes me paso lo mismo pero si encontre el puerto de enlace pero ahora no lo encuentro....alguien mepuede orientar donde encontrarlo y probar

Wow, Communication is a headache? That's a laugh. Well it looks like you have come to the right place. You only get very filtered communication when things are going really good here. And for anyone who actually was a developer you already know communication is critical. A lack of communication leaves you with a forum like this. Dozens of questions that get ignored. When did communication and coding become mutually exclusive? Right now the only people talking positive about HexOS are a few folks that depend on this product for their livelihood. Fortunately most people seem to not care or never took anything said up to this that serious. And looking at how many issues there still are unanswered in the forums and the length some of those have been around. Some issues have been able to celebrate birthdays. And if you want something to think about, riddle me this. If communication is like this now when we are in "BETA" and there is still goodwill stemming all the way back to the LTT video, What will it be like when we have HexOS 1.* and the product is release to production. Do you think the communication will get better then? The entire team has made it easy to get down on this product/project but if your going to be honest with yourself you still see the possibilities that attracted you in the first place. If you love the product and you are honest with yourself you see the cracks and holes that give you an uneasy feeling. Everyone in the middle is pretty meh in that it will do what they need but maybe not what they want. And just off on the horizon is the real issue we have been dancing around. A perfect HexOS is still just a skin wrapped around parts of TrueNAS. It will never be more than that and no matter how hard you look you were never promised more than that. If you don't want to learn TrueNAS then welcome to a sturdy and easy to setup network attached storage appliance. As Immich has shown us multiple times, the application curation process was just to make the initial install easier and more standardized. It is not to make Immich work or eliminate code product issues and design changes. What kind of communication do you expect when a new release of an app or perhaps TrueNAS itself wants to change something fundamental like their storage or security models. And from who? It's probably time we stop worrying about when production version 1.0 is coming and start trying to figure out what we are willing to do to make it work. Learn TrueNAS? Buy new hardware? Buy consulting services? Cut your losses and find something else? Regardless of all the rest , it seems you can't count on communication or timelines here. If you can't live with that no matter what you thought in your mind this journey would be, well sorry because this is just the start.

i did clean install and i noticed i am getting these errors SMB shares have path-related configuration issues that may impact service stability: Applications: ACL type mismatch with child mountpoint at /mnt/HDDs/Applications/plex/config: HDDs/Applications - NFSV4, HDDs/Applications/plex/config - POSIX 2026-03-24 21:31:40 (America/Los_Angeles) Re-OpenGo to SMB shares

Yup. Having the same issue. Will try the fix above.

yes and know i had multiple drives ccause they were raid and i somehow lost the pool but the pool data was still on the drive but when i try to import the pool via truenas or try to readd via hex is says that it will delete the data atm im currently copying the data off the drive but its all being called like file_0_3ds not the actual name i know that nameing is usually stored on the drive but i was wondering if it was possible to retrieve it all off the drive they redo it and add the info that been copied off it with the naming system to get it back to what it was

If i am understanding correctly you have a single drive that was part of a pool and you would like to retrieve the files using a different operating system?

with that amount of cores, a gold bar worth of ram and plenty of storage I think you'll have a pretty good time

have question im able to retrieve the files off a drive that was in a hexos server but when i try to import the pool it says it may delete the data but im able to get the data off but it doesnt have the porper naming that was when it was a drive in hex os is there a way to put the data back on the drive and restore it or is there a way to find the way the system names files and download it off the drive and retrieve it that way

Is an old Datto appliance... an S4e12 was the model... the specs: CPU: 2 x Intel Xeon Silver 4210 (total of 40 cores) RAM: 64 GB of DDR4 Has a total of 12 3.5 inch bays, 2 2.5 inch bays and at least 1 m.2 slot. I currently have 6 x 4 TB drives for 1 pool, 3 x 6 TB drives for a second pool, and 2 x 1 TB SSDs for another pool and the boot drive is on an 500 GB m.2 SSD. I plan on adding at least 2 more 4 TB drives to increase the pool size to 28 TB and 1 more 6 TB drive to increase the other pool to 18 TB. Eventually, I would love to use much larger drives, but gotta wait for the price of drives to come down. I feel like this system is a bit overkill for home use, but I plan on running some VMs off of it as well. What do you guys think?

I'm not sure how much time I can put to all the testing but I access things remotely almost daily so I'll throw my hat in the ring to test things that I can. Missed deadlines suck. Lack of communication sucks. A better system doesn't exist. Learning from it is all we can do not just the developers but the community as well. Most of us are pretty accepting of changes. When I read Q1 2026 I think Q3 2026. If I need to test a few things before getting a second server setup at one of my kids' house so be it. I want to see this succeed. I haven't seen anything that is really delayed or missing. My only two issues that I had in all of this was the first when trying to migrate from Unraid and I lost everything (36TB) which was not the software's fault and I accepted the risk for, and when I lost connection to my server which was apparently something getting gummed in the works between my server and the remote connection. Having a local interface would have meant not even seeing that issue I'm all for getting this working.

@Ammonia some people seem to be getting that to work in this thread

Same here, does not work. Upgrade through HexOS "App upgrade failed". If in TrueNAS UI: " Error: postgres_image_selector Input should be 'vectorchord_18_image"

It works

dont work

I just wanted to take a moment to thank you, I was avoiding dealing with my problem for 2 weeks... I had almost the exact same issue and going into TrueNas to delete the folder you mentioned allowed me to reinstall Plex, reclaim then re-add my libraries. Many thanks to you for updating the thread with your resolution!

Alright, maybe not the solution you want but it worked for me. I installed jellyfin through truenas. This guide will point you generally correctly, https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/installation/advanced/truenas/. The important bit is to add your 'Movies' and 'Shows' folders under Additional storage. Hope it helps!

Does anyone have any experience with this one? GitHub - KaiHongTan/truenas-printserver · GitHub

Can confirm same behavior on my end.

I'm having the same issue, I checked the logs in truenas while the app is starting and get the following: 2026-03-22 10:50:51.995861+00:00Unhandled exception. System.UnauthorizedAccessException: Access to the path '/cache/.jellyfin-cache' is denied. 2026-03-22 10:50:51.995892+00:00---> System.IO.IOException: Permission denied 2026-03-22 10:50:51.995900+00:00--- End of inner exception stack trace --- 2026-03-22 10:50:51.995906+00:00at Interop.ThrowExceptionForIoErrno(ErrorInfo errorInfo, String path, Boolean isDirError) 2026-03-22 10:50:51.995916+00:00at Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeFileHandle.Open(String path, OpenFlags flags, Int32 mode, Boolean failForSymlink, Boolean& wasSymlink, Func`4 createOpenException) 2026-03-22 10:50:51.995922+00:00at Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeFileHandle.Open(String fullPath, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share, FileOptions options, Int64 preallocationSize, UnixFileMode openPermissions, Int64& fileLength, UnixFileMode& filePermissions, Boolean failForSymlink, Boolean& wasSymlink, Func`4 createOpenException) It seems like it cannot access the /cache folder. Will investigate further.

I was just about to start my journey into the HexOS/TrueNAS ecosystem until I realized I also use my current Media server/NAS as a network print server. The printer is a Brother HL-2035 connected via USB to the server, and then serving the printer as a shared printer on the network. Are there any easy ways to do that with HexOS/TrueNAS?

I don't know if "many" are thinking that, @vogam7, but I'm not. As @G-M0N3Y-2503 says this is par for the course in software development. "Communication" is a lot more work and headache than you would think and their time is much better spent on making the software.

It also could be the case that they've done a bunch of internal testing and are just gradually rolling it out. But In software development delays occur, and people will be upset. It's way better to phrase an initial role out as early access testing in case there is an unforeseen showstopper. Than say it's good and then be called out for buggy software. So really it's a matter of if they hire PR or a community manager or not. I vote that there are better ways to spend that money. Considering that roadmaps and timelines are just a guess to attempt to make people happy, from my perspective they've been about as inaccurate as I'd expect, so no red flags from my perspective.

I forgot to answer about the Hexos license transfer part: Yes, that is possible and even very easier. On the Hexos website you just need to unclaim your old server and can then reclaim your new server, but It might take a couple of hours until your license because available again after unclaiming it from the old server.

I'll just say what many are thinking here.. you're launching a hexos local beta just 9 days before the promised stable release date. How could this be included in 1.0 and called stable in under a week of testing? Refunds seem to be the go-to response for anyone who expresses frustration in other threads.. but that's beside the point for those of us who actually want this project to succeed. Missed deadlines are frustrating enough, but the communication issues that still keep coming up alongside them make it worse.. and for a project that depends on people investing in hardware, that trust matters. Server memory and now drives have nearly doubled since the originally promised end of 2025 release date. Every delay has a cost beyond just frustration. A straight timeline update would go a long way. I don't think you meant it this way, but the timing of this post is pretty telling... are we in for another delay?

Hi i just got Hexos up and running with a few apps and wanted to start getting my media server up and running. I installed jellyfinn and the Arr apps and got gluetun setup through dockge. I think now i just need to add gluetun into the networking in the .yml file for each arr app. For the life of me i cant find the .yml files to edit as they are made through hexos curated apps. Any way to access them to add gluetun for networking?