All Activity

I recently upgraded my GPU from a GTX960 to a GTX1660 SUPER. After I got the server up and running again I went into the true nas shell and ran NVIDIA-SMI to make sure the GPU is showing correctly and it is. However when I noticed I wasn't transcoding in Jellyfin I checked to make sure the GPU was still set to pass through, and it wasn't. I checked the box and hit update and then I get this error: error FAILED [EFAULT] Failed to render compose templates: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/apps_render_app", line 33, in sys.exit(load_entry_point('apps-validation==0.1', 'console_scripts', 'apps_render_app')()) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/catalog_templating/scripts/render_compose.py", line 47, in main render_templates_from_path(args.path, args.values) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/catalog_templating/scripts/render_compose.py", line 19, in render_templates_from_path rendered_data = render_templates( ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/catalog_templating/render.py", line 36, in render_templates ).render({'ix_lib': template_libs, 'values': test_values}) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 1301, in render self.environment.handle_exception() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 936, in handle_exception raise rewrite_traceback_stack(source=source) File "/mnt/.ix-apps/app_configs/jellyfin/versions/1.1.21/templates/docker-compose.yaml", line 3, in top-level template code {% set c1 = tpl.add_container(values.consts.jellyfin_container_name, "image") %} ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/mnt/.ix-apps/app_configs/jellyfin/versions/1.1.21/templates/library/base_v2_1_16/render.py", line 59, in add_container container = Container(self, name, image) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/mnt/.ix-apps/app_configs/jellyfin/versions/1.1.21/templates/library/base_v2_1_16/container.py", line 94, in __init__ self.deploy: Deploy = Deploy(self._render_instance) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/mnt/.ix-apps/app_configs/jellyfin/versions/1.1.21/templates/library/base_v2_1_16/deploy.py", line 15, in __init__ self.resources: Resources = Resources(self._render_instance) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/mnt/.ix-apps/app_configs/jellyfin/versions/1.1.21/templates/library/base_v2_1_16/resources.py", line 24, in __init__ self._auto_add_gpus_from_values() File "/mnt/.ix-apps/app_configs/jellyfin/versions/1.1.21/templates/library/base_v2_1_16/resources.py", line 55, in _auto_add_gpus_from_values raise RenderError(f"Expected [uuid] to be set for GPU in slot [{pci}] in [nvidia_gpu_selection]") base_v2_1_16.error.RenderError: Expected [uuid] to be set for GPU in slot [0000:01:00.0] in [nvidia_gpu_selection] add_circle_outlineMore info... I've been googling for a few days and I can't find any solution that could help. I made sure the right GPU is showing up in the jellyfin/immich settings, I've rebooted and made sure the GPU isn't isolated in truenas. Anyone run into anything like this?

Yes, trueNas makes sense though since it's been around for a while. But HexOS has not. all I'm saying I find it interesting that they'd take the time considering HexOS isn't even out of "beta"

Most users have reported not losing data but it is at your own risk. The less risky alternative is unplugging all your storage drives then going through hexos deck setup, once you are done with that you can turn off and then put everything back in

both HexOs and Truenas are on the website:

I have the same issue with my Lincstation N2. My 10 gbe port shows up as 5 gbe. I didn't do a deep dive yet. I wil run some network test later on.

I was visiting ROMM's site wanting to learn more about it since it's my planned ROM Manager when HexOS finally gets out of beta. Just making plans of the things I want. And saw this. I don't know if ROMM put it up there cause HexOS is built on top of trueNAS or if they've been in talks with HexOS about the OneClick App install. I just found it interesting since yes probably adding it to the little marquee is easy, it's the fact that they did it.

Anyone have this issue? The switch it's connected to is a TRENDnet 6-Port 10G Switch, 4 x 2.5G RJ-45 Base-T Ports. Ethernet cables are UGREEN Cat 8 Ethernet Cable 6FT and should have been able to support 10gig as well.

I reinstalled after upgrading my LAN card, and all data was lost, I knew it probably would happen and it did, no great pain, as I was able to copy it again, only about 1.5 TB of Data, but I can see for larger amounts that would be a bigger issue. I'm not sure if you can currently reinstall and keep data as it was.

I’m confused. He was asking for kernel swap for hardware support. I would think that means drivers. Maybe I’m misunderstanding?

If you are comfortable in linux. You could symlink the folders so /movies redirects to /media/movies To redirect /movies to /media/movies using a symbolic link, do the following: 1. Delete or move the existing /movies directory (if it’s not empty or already used): sudo rm -r /movies (Or use mv to back it up: sudo mv /movies /movies_backup) 2. Create the symlink: sudo ln -s /media/movies /movies This creates a symbolic link at /movies that points to /media/movies. Accessing /movies will now show the contents of /media/movies.

I think it's the not upgradable 2gb of ram

Forgive the ignorance but what about this hardware isn’t supported? NIC? Storage controller? Something else?

That’s correct

i figured it out. for some reason it wanted to auto use previous login info. so i guess i shouldnt use the same sever name lol. i just had to click on the "use different credentials" tab.

I believe windows 11 introduced some complications with smb shares. As a mac user i just never looked deeper into it and forgot the fix for it. hopefully someone else can point you towards the right direction

i believe he is using a readynas 422 here are its specs

hey guys, i feel like i should be able to figure this out on my own but im starting to bleed from all the blunt-brick-truama. im spinning my HEXos server back up and wanted to test out some new upgrades for Plex. but i cant access any of the folders/shares. i did a fresh reinstall with new users and folders. i was able to install plex but now that ive uninstalled it, i cant install plex in the apps menu.

In case there is any confusion still on this topic, a local UI is coming...100%. We actually have already begun work (we have a docker container with the UI running at this point, but it's not fully functional yet).

As Magnus mentioned above, this is a key area for him. It does take time for us to get all of the accessibility features right, but this isn't an area we intend to ignore. Accessibility is important to us.

What specific hardware are you referring to?

Came across something really cool in a short circuit video TLDW its a ups/psu all in one unit. The second there is a beefier higher wattage version of this, i am most definitely getting it.

You know, for now it sits there really doing nothing, temperature is very moderate and no noise. I explained in an earlier post about the questions I still have, that makes me a bit paralyzed, for lack of a better word, when it comes to testing the PocketNAS for real. ”It’s apparent I’ve taken a little break from the HexOS implementation. It’s just that many questions are up in the air, a situation which don’t help me going forward. By writing them down here I try to make the road ahead a little smoother. It makes me being able to focus on one problem at a time. I hope. So here we go: Smb shares possible without installing anything? Separate pool for smb shares? (correct zfs terminology?) Getting my main Windows PC going, for smb shares Delete TrueNAS_admin account, and create another administrator user? Static IP (realized by DHCP reservations?) Https instead of http?” When I’m there, all question marks straightened and NAS is working moving my model files, I’ll let you know more.

Keep in touch. I'm hoping to have ~5TB allocated for buddy backup once the feature is released.

I truly relate to this. It's when the magic happens. It looks like you've been having a really good time creating unique builds and finding ways to leverage the devices and at a relatively low cost as well! This is great stuff!

Not a bad little device, especially for the "new to the DIY/NAS" community. I think we're seeing a definite move towards compact devices. The N1xx series from Intel has been a big hit for low to mid range devices which is perfect for the demographic I mentioned. Geopolitics aside, I hope to see an increase in performance over time. Thanks for sharing!